Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, information-dense skill body with concrete commands, a clear workflow, a documented fail-closed behavior, and an exemplary one-level-deep reference structure. The main defects are the missing requirements.txt referenced by the install command, minor duplicated content, and no recovery step for the documented failure mode.
Suggestions
Add a requirements.txt to the bundle (or fix the install command to reference the actual dependency-install path) so the prerequisite step in the Workflow section is executable as written.
Deduplicate the FMP API key guidance — keep it in Prerequisites and drop the repeated --api-key detail from Script Arguments, or vice versa — and consolidate the reference file listing into the Resources section only.
Add a brief recovery step after the fail-closed note, e.g. what to inspect first (FMP key validity, network failures, per-component data availability) before concluding the analysis cannot run.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well compressed — the 6-component table, regime list, and comparison table convey dense information without padding, and it assumes Claude's competence throughout. It falls short of 5 due to minor redundancy: the FMP API key guidance appears in both "Prerequisites" and "Script Arguments", and the three reference documents are listed twice (Workflow step 1/4 and the "Resources" section). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The workflow gives mostly executable guidance: a concrete install command, a ready-to-run `uv run python3 skills/macro-regime-detector/scripts/macro_regime_detector.py --output-dir reports/` invocation, and documented CLI options. It is not 5 because the install step targets `skills/macro-regime-detector/requirements.txt`, a file that does not exist anywhere in the bundle (only SKILL.md, references/, and scripts/ are present), so the prerequisite step as written would fail. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step workflow (load references → run script → read report → present findings) is clearly sequenced and includes an explicit failure-mode checkpoint: "The detector fails closed and writes no report when none of its six components has usable data. Do not treat a missing report or non-zero exit as a valid low-transition regime." It stops short of 5 because there is no recovery guidance for that failure (e.g., what to check or retry), only a warning not to misread it. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a clean overview: methodology and interpretation detail are pushed to `references/regime_detection_methodology.md`, `references/indicator_interpretation_guide.md`, and `references/historical_regimes.md` — all of which exist in the bundle — referenced one level deep and clearly signaled both in the workflow and in a Resources section. No inlining of content that belongs in separate files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |