Runs a declarative strategy spec over OHLCV bars with the manifoldbt Rust engine, pairs the fill log into round trips, and emits the eight inputs the backtest-expert skill scores. Use when the user wants to execute a backtest, measure a rule they have described, obtain win rate / average win / average loss / max drawdown from real bars, or feed backtest-expert with measured numbers instead of estimates.
75
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Execute what backtest-expert teaches. That skill grades a backtest on five
dimensions, and its prerequisites say "metrics are user-provided": it scores
numbers it never produces. This skill produces them. It runs a strategy over
real bars and returns the eight inputs its evaluator asks for.
The two chain in one direction: spec, run, evaluate.
backtest-expert is about to run and the numbers do not exist yetLeave the verdict to backtest-expert. It owns the thresholds and the red
flags, and this skill does not duplicate them.
pip install manifoldbt (Apache 2.0 with Commons Clause; the free tier covers
everything this skill does)timestamp, open, high, low, close, volumeA spec names indicators and one entry condition. Keep it to the smallest rule that states the hypothesis. Every added knob makes an in-sample fit easier to reach by accident, and the evaluator penalises the count.
{
"name": "sma_cross_costed",
"indicators": {
"fast": { "type": "sma", "period": 20 },
"slow": { "type": "sma", "period": 60 }
},
"entry": { "left": "fast", "op": ">", "right": "slow" },
"size": 1.0,
"stop_loss_pct": 1.5,
"fees_bps": 5.0,
"slippage_bps": 2.0
}Field reference: references/strategy_spec.md.
Set fees_bps and slippage_bps to realistic values before you read any
result. A frictionless run scores 0 on execution realism, and over short holding
periods costs decide whether an edge survives.
python3 scripts/run_backtest.py \
--spec strategy.json \
--data bars.csv \
--symbol BTCUSDT \
--json-out result.jsonThe script validates the spec before it touches the data, so you see a spec mistake in a second instead of after a long load.
The run prints warnings that change how you should read the result: a sample under 30 trades, a span under a year, no friction modelled, or a gap between the engine's win rate and the paired one. Each one is a reason to fix the setup and run again.
Three conditions stop the handoff instead of producing a score: no completed round trips, missing or non-finite maximum drawdown, and scratch trades. The evaluator has no scratch input, so passing a population that contains them would make its derived expectancy disagree with the completed trades.
The run ends with a command you can paste. Run it, or invoke the
backtest-expert skill with the same figures:
python3 skills/backtest-expert/scripts/evaluate_backtest.py \
--total-trades 3854 --win-rate 20.24 \
--avg-win-pct 0.2917 --avg-loss-pct 0.2342 \
--max-drawdown-pct 99.2893 --years-tested 0 \
--num-parameters 3 --slippage-testedBetween an engine's output and the evaluator's inputs sit four conversions. Each one yields a plausible number and scores the strategy wrongly. None of them raises.
A fill is one execution, a round trip is two. The raw trade count runs at about twice the number of round trips. Feed fills to the sample-size dimension and you double the apparent sample, which can lift a thin backtest over a threshold it should not clear.
Buy and sell alternate only in the simplest case. That holds for a single-symbol long-only strategy that never scales a position. Shorting breaks it, because a sell can open. Scaling breaks it, because one exit answers several entries. A universe breaks it, because fills interleave. This skill tracks position per symbol and closes a trip when it crosses back through flat. Entry and exit quantities and cash values accumulate across that whole lifecycle; their weighted-average prices are display values, while PnL comes from the cash flows themselves.
Costs decide small trades. At 7 bps a side, a trade that gains 0.1% on price
loses money. Expectancy comes from the win rate and the average winner together,
so a gross win rate beside net averages misstates the edge. Percentages here are
net of fees, and gross_return_pct sits alongside for inspection.
The engine signs drawdown negative. The evaluator wants a positive magnitude. Pass the raw value and a 38% fall scores as a flawless run.
Supported: sma, ema, rsi over any OHLC column; one entry condition using
>, <, >=, <= against another indicator, a price column or a number;
optional stop-loss and take-profit; fees and slippage in basis points;
long-only.
Refused: multi-condition entries, shorting, multi-asset universes, and indicators outside the three above. The engine does all of these. This skill covers the shapes a one-sentence hypothesis produces, and rejects the rest instead of half-handling it.
references/strategy_spec.md covers every spec field, its default, and what
validation refusesreferences/metric_bridge.md covers the eight inputs, how each is derived,
and the trap in each conversionscripts/run_backtest.py runs a spec against barsscripts/spec.py validates a spec and counts its parametersscripts/round_trips.py pairs fills into round trips with net returnsscripts/bridge.py assembles the evaluator's eight inputsspec.py, round_trips.py and bridge.py carry no dependencies and import
without the engine, so you can test the logic without running a backtest.
eab8d5c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.