Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, actionable analysis workflow with an excellent output template and appropriate use of a one-level-deep reference file. Its main costs are repetition — three sections restate the description or earlier steps, and probability guidance is duplicated between the body and the reference — plus the absence of a worked example.
Suggestions
Delete the 'Important Notes' section: every bullet either restates a workflow step (think in English, reference the knowledge base, 1-week/1-month timeframes) or is covered by 'Key Analysis Principles'.
Remove the inline 'Probability Guidelines' section and keep only the pointer in Step 4 ('see Probability Assessment Framework in sector_rotation.md'), since the reference file already contains the identical 70-85/50-70/30-50/15-30 ranges.
Trim 'When to Use This Skill' and 'Key Analysis Principles' — the former duplicates the frontmatter description, and generic principles like 'Objectivity First' add tokens without adding information Claude doesn't already have; replace with one compact worked example of a scenario with probability assignment.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow and output template are efficient, but the body repeats itself: 'Important Notes' restates instructions from Steps 1-2 and the description, 'When to Use This Skill' duplicates the frontmatter description, and 'Key Analysis Principles' offers generic advice ('Let the data guide conclusions, not preconceptions') Claude already knows. Not score 2 because the core workflow and template earn their tokens; not score 4 because multiple sections could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: an exact output filename convention ('sector_analysis_YYYY-MM-DD.md'), a complete Markdown output template, specific probability ranges, and a named reference to read. It falls short of 5 because there is no worked example of a filled-in scenario analysis covering the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step sequence is clearly ordered with a required-sections checklist and a probability-sum constraint ('Total probabilities across all scenarios should sum to approximately 100%'), plus contradictory-signal checks in Step 3. Not 5 because validation is stated as guidance rather than explicit checkpoint steps, and there is no error-recovery/feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with a clearly signaled, verified one-level-deep reference ('Read references/sector_rotation.md') and a Resources section describing both the reference and the three sample assets. Not 5 because the inline 'Probability Guidelines' section duplicates the 'Probability Assessment Framework' in the reference file with identical ranges, content that should live only in the reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |