Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with a clear workflow and a complete output template, and it makes good use of real bundle files. It is weakened by repeated redundant English-language reminders and a lack of explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
Consolidate the English-language requirement into a single statement instead of repeating it in Step 1, 'Important Notes', and the closing notes.
Add explicit validation checkpoints — e.g., after Step 1 verify extracted performance figures, and after Step 4 confirm scenario probabilities sum to ~100% before generating output.
Trim 'Key Analysis Principles' entries that restate obvious behavior (e.g., 'Objectivity First', 'No Absolutes') to reduce token overhead.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but includes redundant padding — the English-language instruction is repeated across Step 1, 'Important Notes', and the closing notes, and 'Key Analysis Principles' restates fairly obvious guidance ('Objectivity First', 'No Absolutes'). | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 5-step workflow, a full copy-paste Markdown output template, and numeric probability guidelines; minor gaps are that probability-sum verification is stated rather than enforced as a step. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence exists, but validation checkpoints are absent — there is no explicit step to verify extracted chart data, confirm probabilities sum to ~100% as a checkpoint, or sanity-check the cycle mapping before producing output. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with a 'Resources' section that signals real one-level-deep references (references/sector_rotation.md and the assets/*.jpeg files, all confirmed to exist); only minor gap is the lengthy inline output template. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |