CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

signal-postmortem

Record and analyze post-trade outcomes for signals generated by edge pipeline and other skills. Track false positives, missed opportunities, and regime mismatches. Feed results back to edge-signal-aggregator weights and skill improvement backlog.

62

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/signal-postmortem/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is well-structured and highly actionable, with copy-paste commands, a clear five-step workflow, and clean progressive disclosure to real reference files. Minor conciseness redundancy and the absence of explicit per-step validation checkpoints are the only weak spots.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept explanations), and uses terse command blocks; the Overview section restates the frontmatter description, a minor instance of over-explanation that keeps it below 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash commands with real flags and file paths for listing, batch recording, manual recording, feedback generation, and summary, plus concrete JSON/YAML output examples covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear Step 1–5 sequence with a command per step and a statistical-validity guardrail (the 20-signal minimum-sample principle and confidence field); lacks explicit per-step verify checkpoints, so it sits at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that points one level deep to verified bundle files (outcome-classification.md, feedback-integration.md, two scripts) via a clearly signaled Resources section and an inline reference, with bulk detail appropriately split out.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys what the skill does with concrete, domain-specific actions, but omits an explicit 'Use when…' trigger clause, capping completeness and trigger-term quality. It is distinctive within a trading-skill ecosystem.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when…' trigger clause naming concrete situations (e.g., 'Use when reviewing closed signals at their 5- or 20-day holding period, auditing signal quality, or recalibrating edge-signal-aggregator weights').

Include natural user-facing synonyms and the input artifact (e.g., 'signal postmortem', 'trade outcome review', 'aggregated_signals JSON') to improve trigger-term coverage.

Tighten the action list toward comprehensive coverage by naming the concrete outputs (weight-adjustment suggestions and improvement-backlog entries) as distinct actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — 'Record and analyze post-trade outcomes', 'Track false positives, missed opportunities, and regime mismatches', 'Feed results back to edge-signal-aggregator weights and skill improvement backlog' — which matches the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor; not a 5 because the action list is not fully comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no explicit 'when should Claude use it' trigger clause; the guideline caps completeness at 3 when trigger guidance is absent.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains domain-natural phrases ('false positives', 'missed opportunities', 'regime mismatches', 'signals') but lacks a 'Use when…' trigger clause and common synonyms or file extensions, matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a distinct niche (post-trade signal postmortems feeding edge-signal-aggregator) with low conflict risk; minor overlap with the related aggregator skill keeps it just below 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.