Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill: lean overview, clear advice workflow, and exemplary progressive disclosure with three real, purpose-labeled reference files. The main weaknesses are moderate redundancy between the principles, style, and cautions sections, and body-level guidance that defers most concrete analytical detail to the references.
Suggestions
Merge the overlapping points in 回答スタイル and 注意事項 into the 概要 principles (or a single section) to remove repetition of capital preservation, flexibility, and humility.
Inline one or two concrete analytical heuristics from the references (e.g., how to evaluate central bank liquidity conditions) so the body can guide a first response without file loads.
Add an explicit revisiting step to the advice workflow (e.g., re-assess the 18-month outlook when user reports changed conditions) to close the workflow-clarity gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient structured bullets and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but sections like "回答スタイル" ("謙虚さ: 市場に対する謙虚さを忘れない") and parts of "注意事項" repeat principles already stated in "概要" (e.g., capital preservation and flexibility appear in both), so it could be tightened. Not a 2 because the padding is limited to a couple of overlapping sections rather than pervasive verbosity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There is some concrete guidance — named heuristics like "年に1-2回の絶好の機会を待ち" and "18か月先の未来に投資せよ", plus a four-step advice procedure — but the analytical 'how' is deferred to the references, leaving the body's own guidance at the 'incomplete / missing key details' level. It is above a 2 because the step sequence and question-type taxonomy give real direction rather than high-level hints only. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "アドバイスの提供方法" lays out a clear ordered sequence (現状分析 → ドラッケンミラー流の視点 → 具体的な行動指針 → 重要な警告) and "基本的な質問への対応" categorizes input types, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. Validation checkpoints are not expected for an advisory, non-destructive skill, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply; it falls short of 5 only because no explicit feedback/re-check step exists for revising advice as market conditions change. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that clearly signals three one-level-deep references, each with a stated purpose ("投資哲学の詳細: references/investment-philosophy.md", "市場分析手法: references/market-analysis-guide.md", "実例と応用: references/case-studies.md"), and all three files exist in the bundle with matching content. This matches the top anchor: clear overview, well-signaled references, easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |