Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body with executable commands and clear sequencing. The main gap is the workflow's references to a prompts/ directory that does not exist in the bundle, and validation checkpoints that are implied rather than explicit.
Suggestions
Either add the referenced prompts/ files (system_prompt.md, developer_prompt_template.md, critique_prompt_template.md) to the bundle or remove the references to them from the Workflow section so all cited paths resolve.
Make the validation/guardrail checkpoint explicit in the Workflow (e.g., 'After pass 2, verify each hypothesis card has a kill criterion; if any lacks one, revise before export') with a fix-and-retry loop.
Clarify what 'Step H strategy exporter' refers to — the numbered workflow only goes to 6, so this reference to an unlisted step is ambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — the body is a compact overview with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands for both passes, but the workflow references prompt files (prompts/system_prompt.md, developer_prompt_template.md, critique_prompt_template.md) that are not present in the bundle, leaving a gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step sequence split into pass 1/pass 2 with guardrails referenced in step 5, but explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops are only implied rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with one-level-deep references (references/hypothesis_types.md, evidence_quality_guide.md) that exist as real files; the body's references to a prompts/ directory that is absent in the bundle is a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |