Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable skill body that points to a verified bundle of one-level-deep references, sequences a multi-step review workflow with explicit checkpoints, and avoids padding. The only minor weakness is slight redundancy between the Overview and the frontmatter description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the Overview paragraph repeats the frontmatter description's framing and some bullet lists (When to Use) could be slightly condensed, leaving minor trim opportunities that keep it below the lean/5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready bash commands with full paths, a concrete YAML input schema, a verdict table, explicit allowed actions, and specific operating-rule examples referencing a real script and existing fixtures, matching the fully-executable top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps each carry explicit sub-checklists, an incomplete-data fallback (default to REVIEW_REQUIRED/journal_only), and an explicit human decision gate as a terminal checkpoint, satisfying clear sequence with explicit validation and checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with a Resources section that signals one-level-deep references (review-framework, behavior-tags, risk-review-checklist, output-contract, hermes-integration) plus the asset schema and script, all verified to exist in the bundle, with content appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |