Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered skill body: executable commands grounded in real fixtures, a precise input/output contract, a clearly sequenced workflow with a decision gate, and exemplary progressive disclosure to verified bundle files. The only notable flaw is redundant repetition of the scope/guardrail messaging across three sections, plus a missing explicit output-validation step.
Suggestions
State the no-advice/no-therapy scope boundary once (e.g., keep the Guardrails section) and reference it from Overview and When Not to Use instead of repeating it three times, trimming roughly 10 lines.
Add a final workflow step to validate the generated JSON report against assets/performance_coach_report.schema.json before presenting it, closing the workflow's only validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is checklist-lean throughout — a field-level input spec, terse workflow bullets, a verdict table, and one-line resource descriptions — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. However, the scope-limit messaging ('never recommends entering, exiting, buying, selling...', 'do not provide therapy', no shaming) is stated three times across Overview, When Not to Use, and Guardrails, which is more than the 'minor instances' of the 4 anchor but well short of the padding of the 2 anchor; the triple repetition keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: a copy-paste bash invocation with real paths, a second example command running an existing fixture ('scripts/tests/fixtures/single_trade_rule_violation_loss.json', verified present) with '--markdown', an exact 14-field output contract, a verdict table with semantics, and concrete next-session rule examples ('cap risk at 0.5R for the next two trades after a rule violation'). This matches the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready; specific examples cover the common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven workflow steps are clearly sequenced (collect records → evaluate adherence → risk → execution → patterns → operating rules → human decision gate), with an explicit fallback checkpoint for incomplete input ('default to REVIEW_REQUIRED or journal_only mode and ask for missing records') and a terminal decision gate. It sits at 4 rather than 5 because there is no explicit output-verification step (e.g., validating the generated JSON against the bundled assets/performance_coach_report.schema.json), though as a read-only analysis skill it avoids the destructive/batch cap of 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Resources section is a clearly signaled, one-level-deep map ('Read these selectively when invoked') to seven real bundle files, each with a one-line purpose description, and every referenced path (five references/*.md, the schema asset, and the script) was verified to exist. The body keeps only overview-level detail inline while the review framework, tag definitions, and checklist live in the references, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |