Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized process-review skill body: concise, executable, with a sequenced workflow and a validation fallback, and a clean overview-to-reference disclosure structure. All referenced bundle files are present.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: it does not explain what a trade, stop, or risk plan is, and each section (Overview, When to Use, Inputs, Workflow, Output, Guardrails) earns its place without filler. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides an executable `python3 .../review_trade_performance.py` command with flags, a concrete yaml input schema, an explicit verdict table, and enumerated next-session operating rules — copy-paste ready rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint: incomplete input defaults to REVIEW_REQUIRED/journal_only mode, and every report ends in a human decision gate with allowed actions. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references ('Read these selectively') to real bundle files — all five references, the schema, and the script exist — with no nested indirection. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |