CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gemini

Gemini CLI for one-shot Q&A, summaries, and generation.

80

1.32x
Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.32x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./openclaw/skills/gemini/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is gemini in openclaw/openclaw

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model of token-efficient skill authoring: concrete one-shot commands, well-labeled sections, an auth fallback, and an explicit safety note to avoid --yolo. The only weakness is placeholder syntax in the Extensions section that keeps it from being fully copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~20-line body is lean and efficient: every line is an executable command or an operational note, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'.

5 / 5

Actionability

Mostly executable commands (e.g., 'gemini "Answer this question..."', 'gemini --output-format json "Return JSON"'), but placeholders like 'gemini extensions <command>' and '--model <name>' leave minor gaps, matching 'concrete code or commands with minor gaps' rather than fully copy-paste-ready coverage.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill and the single action (one-shot invocation with a positional prompt) is unambiguous, plus a concrete auth fallback note ('run gemini once interactively and follow the login flow'); no destructive or batch operations require validation, so the simple-skill exception applies.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references (no bundle files exist), and its content is organized into clear sections (Quick start, Extensions, Notes), which merits a 5 under the scoring note for simple skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies the tool and its broad capabilities in third-person, concise form, but it lacks any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance and its action labels are generic. It is serviceable yet below the quality of the reference examples, which pair concrete capabilities with explicit trigger phrases.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to consult Gemini/Google's model or wants a second opinion from another LLM'.

Replace the generic action 'generation' with concrete capabilities such as 'draft code, write documents, or transform text' so each action is specific.

Include natural trigger variations users would actually say (e.g., 'ask Gemini', 'Google Gemini', 'Gemini CLI') to improve keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Gemini CLI") and 2-3 actions ("one-shot Q&A, summaries, and generation"), but the actions are short generic labels rather than several specific concrete capabilities, matching the anchor 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'.

3 / 5

Completeness

It has a clear 'what' (one-shot Q&A, summaries, and generation via the Gemini CLI) but no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Q&A" and "summaries" are terms users would naturally say, but "generation" is generic and common variations or synonyms (e.g., "ask Gemini", "Google Gemini", "second opinion") are missing, matching 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming a specific third-party tool ("Gemini CLI") makes it mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against other LLM-CLI or model-invocation skills, matching 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills'.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
trpc-group/trpc-agent-go
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.