gemini

Gemini CLI for one-shot Q&A, summaries, and generation.

1.32x

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.32x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model of brevity and actionability: it gives executable one-shot commands and clear behavioral notes without over-explaining. As a compact, single-purpose skill it organizes its few sections well and needs no external references.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence ("Use Gemini in one-shot mode with a positional prompt (avoid interactive mode)") with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (e.g. `gemini "Answer this question..."`, `gemini --model <name> "Prompt..."`, `gemini --output-format json "Return JSON"`), fitting "Fully executable code/commands; specific examples; copy-paste ready".	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	This is a simple single-task skill where the single action (run `gemini` with a positional prompt) is unambiguous; per the simple_skills note, workflow clarity scores 3, and no destructive/batch validation is needed.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with no external bundle files needed, and content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Quick start, Extensions, Notes), satisfying the under-50-lines exception for a score of 3.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and identifies the tool plus a few use cases, but it reads more as a tagline than a trigger-rich skill description. It lacks an explicit "Use when..." clause and concrete, varied trigger terms, leaving it at the mid-level across all dimensions.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks Gemini to answer a question, summarize text, or generate content in one shot.'

Expand trigger terms with natural variations users would say (e.g. 'summarize', 'ask Gemini', 'one-shot prompt', 'generate text').

Make the actions more concrete (e.g. 'Ask a one-shot question, summarize a document, or generate text') to lift specificity from categories to distinct actions.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the tool and three use-case categories ("one-shot Q&A, summaries, and generation") but these are abstract categories rather than concrete, granular actions, matching the score-2 anchor "Names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive".	2 / 3
Completeness	Answers "what" (Gemini CLI for Q&A/summaries/generation) but provides no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes some natural terms ("Q&A", "summaries") but lacks common variations and any trigger phrase, fitting "Some relevant keywords but missing common variations" rather than the full-coverage score 3.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The named tool (Gemini CLI) gives a clear niche, but the description could still overlap with other AI-generation skills and lacks explicit distinct triggers, matching "Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills".	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: trpc-group/trpc-agent-go
Commit: 737835b

Reviewed: 12 minutes ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.