Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, checkpointed workflow, but loses conciseness points to repeated version-specific model references and does not progressively disclose detail into reference files despite being over 50 lines.
Suggestions
Move the version-specific 'GPT-5.2 Pro' default into a clearly marked current-defaults or deprecation-aware section so model turnover does not penalize conciseness.
Split the detailed flag/attachment and 'exhaustive prompt' reference material into a references/ file (e.g. REFERENCE.md) and point to it from SKILL.md to enable one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
Tighten the prose intro and 'Main use case' section to remove advisory phrasing that restates what the commands already show.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean oracle-specific reference with little general-knowledge padding, but version-specific 'GPT-5.2 Pro' is repeated throughout the main-use-case section outside any deprecated/old-patterns section, which the rubric penalizes. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands with specific flags throughout ('oracle --dry-run summary -p "<task>" --file "src/**"', '--engine browser --model gpt-5.2-pro …'), matching the fully-executable level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Golden path' gives a clear sequence with an explicit preview/token-spend checkpoint (step 2) and a timeout-recovery feedback loop (reattach instead of re-run, step 4), matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections, but it is a single >50-line file with all content inline and no one-level-deep reference files; content like the full flag reference and 'exhaustive prompt' pattern could be split out, matching the level-2 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |