Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable single-purpose skill with well-organized sections and complete JSON examples. Its main gap is the absence of validation/confirmation guidance for destructive message and pin operations.
Suggestions
Add a brief confirmation step before deleteMessage/unpinMessage (e.g., confirm the target messageId with the user or read recent messages first) to satisfy validation checkpoints for destructive actions.
Show a minimal feedback loop for editMessage — read, edit, then re-read to confirm the update took effect.
Clarify how to obtain a valid messageId/channelId from a message context line in one line, since several actions depend on those fields.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — overview, inputs, an action-group table, and one JSON snippet per action with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Each action is shown as a complete, copy-paste-ready JSON object with concrete field names and example values (channelId, messageId, emoji, to/content), fully executable against the tool. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Actions are clearly catalogued but there is no sequencing or validation checkpoint for the destructive operations (deleteMessage, unpinMessage, editMessage); the guideline caps destructive/batch workflows at 2 when feedback loops are missing. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is well-organized into Overview, Inputs, Actions, and Ideas sections, so the simple-skill carve-out earns the top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |