agentsociety-paper-review
Use when a completed research manuscript needs a robust internal, venue-calibrated mock peer review. Orchestrates three isolated reviewer subagents in parallel, then a separate MetaReview subagent that verifies evidence, reports agreement and score dispersion, and emits advisory reroutes. Never revises research artifacts, executes experiments, or updates pipeline state.
78
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required runtime workflow ingests the manuscript text/pages (e.g., `paper/main.pdf` → `scripts/prepare_pdf_review.py` → `paper/reviews/<venue>-review-r<N>/pdf-intake/document.txt` and per-page text/render) and LLMs then read that content to produce reviews.
- Repository
- tsinghua-fib-lab/AgentSociety
- Commit
1832bcb
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.