Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable single-file skill with concrete examples and clear sections; main weaknesses are redundant restatement of the same-type-event rule and the absence of an explicit failure-recovery loop for stateful operations.
Suggestions
State the same-type-active-event continuation rule once (in 约束) and reference it from start_event instead of repeating it verbatim.
Add a brief error-recovery note for what to do when an ask_env start/stop call fails or returns an unexpected state.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of concepts Claude already knows, but the same-type-active-event rule is repeated across the start_event section, an example, and the constraints, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready ask_env calls with real parameters (person 0, event names, second durations) plus a parameter list and reference values, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The query-before-start checkpoint and switch sequence are clear, but stateful start/stop operations lack an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, which caps workflow clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized sections (环境概念, 可用工具, 示例, 约束), no bundle files, and no nested references — appropriate for a skill of this size. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |