Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable, with concrete copy-paste ask_env calls for every tool and clear worked flows plus a light validation checkpoint. Weaknesses are minor: some duplicated example blocks cost conciseness, and the inlined tool reference could be slimmer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete tool signatures, but the 示例 section repeats the refresh_feed and create_post/search_posts blocks verbatim from the tool reference, adding tokens that could be trimmed; matches the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tighter anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every tool ships a copy-pasteable ask_env(...) call with real argument values, and the combined examples (observe+refresh, post+search+like) cover the common cases fully — matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear recommended sequence (observe first each step), worked example flows, and a validation checkpoint ("不确定时先 view_post 查看状态"); operations are non-destructive so the destructive-cap does not apply, leaving only minor checkpoint gaps versus level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the ~180-line single-purpose skill is well-organized into 环概念 / 可用工具 / 示例 / 约束 sections with no nested references, but its length and fully-inlined tool reference keep it just below the ideal level-5 split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |