Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable reference: environment concepts are limited to what is genuinely non-obvious, and every operation has an executable example. The main gaps are the redundant examples section and implicit rather than explicit validation steps in the workflow guidance.
Suggestions
Trim or differentiate the 示例 section — it duplicates the per-tool code blocks; instead show only multi-step sequences that combine tools in ways not already illustrated.
Make the recommended step sequence explicit (e.g. 1. observe → 2. refresh/search → 3. view_post → 4. interact) with a checkpoint such as confirming a post is not already liked before acting.
Consider moving the per-tool API reference into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as a compact overview of concepts and constraints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body only explains environment-specific facts Claude could not know (agent_id === user_id, post fields, feed algorithms, ask_env routing) and skips generic filler. It misses 5 because the 示例 (examples) section largely repeats the per-tool code blocks, adding length without much new information. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every tool comes with a complete, copy-paste-ready ask_env call specifying instruction template, variables, ctx, and readonly — e.g. `instruction="create_post author_id={user_id} content={content} tags={tags}"` with concrete variables — and the 示例 section shows realistic chained sequences covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing guidance is present and concrete: "每个 step 先观察" (observe first each step), examples showing observe → refresh_feed and post → search → like, and an error-recovery hint ("不确定时先 view_post"). It falls short of 5 because validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit steps in a numbered workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file body is well organized into 环境概念 / 可用工具 / 示例 / 约束 with one tool per subsection. It stays a single ~185-line monolith where the per-tool reference or examples could arguably live in a separate reference file, which keeps it at good-structure rather than fully split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |