Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, concrete tool catalog with good sectioning, weakened by verbatim-duplicated examples, only implicit validation checkpoints, and no progressive disclosure to separate files.
Suggestions
Replace the verbatim-duplicated 示例 section with a brief workflow narrative that references the tool calls (e.g. 'observe → refresh_feed → search_posts → like_post') instead of re-pasting the code blocks.
Make the validation pattern explicit as numbered checkpoints — e.g. '1. observe_user; 2. if unsure whether already liked/followed, view_post; 3. then act' — rather than stating observe-first and the view_post hint only as loose principles.
Consider moving the full per-tool reference (可用工具) into a references/ file and keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview that links out, to achieve genuine progressive disclosure for this longer skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-specific content, but the 示例 section repeats tool-reference code blocks verbatim (refresh_feed, create_post, search_posts, like_post), adding redundant tokens that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every tool ships a complete, copy-paste-ready ask_env call with an instruction template, populated variables, ctx, and readonly flag — fully executable rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is present (observe-first principle, ordered examples) and a view_post recovery hint exists, but there are no explicit numbered validation checkpoints/checklists woven through the workflows. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers, but the ~180-line body keeps the full tool catalog and examples inline with no file-level split; the under-50-lines exemption does not apply, so it stops at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |