Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable skill body that keeps concrete examples inline while delegating detailed rules to a single well-signaled reference. Both review and design workflows are clearly sequenced with a checklist for verification.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and scannable — bullet lists, compact tables, and a checklist — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It is not a 2 because every table earns its place and there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete before/after tables with specific code (processData → validateInvoiceLineItems), a copy-ready output format template, and a named checklist give fully executable guidance. It is not a 2 because the guidance is specific and copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode or abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly sequenced modes (Review Mode 1–3, Design Mode 1–5) with the naming checklist serving as an explicit verification step. It is not a 2 because the sequence and checking mechanism are explicit; no destructive/batch operations are present that would require additional validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one clearly-named, one-level-deep reference ("See references/principles.md for detailed rules and naming smells"), and that file exists. It is not a 2 because the reference is clearly signaled and content is appropriately split rather than inlined or nested multiple levels deep. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |