CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

prose

Apply Strunk's writing rules to prose—documentation, commits, error messages, UI text. Clearer, stronger, more professional. Also handles sharpening and tightening drafts by subtraction.

87

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description effectively communicates specific capabilities and targets a clear niche around Strunk-style concise writing for technical contexts. However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause and could benefit from more natural trigger terms that users would actually say when seeking writing help.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to edit, tighten, or improve writing clarity, or mentions Strunk, concise writing, or wordiness.'

Include more natural trigger terms users might say: 'edit my writing', 'make it shorter', 'improve clarity', 'too wordy', 'proofread'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Apply Strunk's writing rules', 'sharpening and tightening drafts by subtraction', and names specific content types: 'documentation, commits, error messages, UI text'.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' (apply Strunk's rules, sharpen/tighten drafts) but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause. The 'when' is only implied through the content types listed.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant keywords like 'documentation', 'commits', 'error messages', 'UI text', 'drafts', but missing common variations users might say like 'edit my writing', 'improve text', 'make it concise', 'proofread', or 'writing style'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The specific reference to 'Strunk's writing rules' and focus on 'subtraction' creates a clear niche distinct from general editing or writing skills. The technical writing focus (commits, error messages, UI text) further distinguishes it.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Implementation

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is an exemplary skill file that demonstrates excellent conciseness while remaining highly actionable. It provides concrete guidance (numbered rules, LLM-ism catalog with fixes, clear workflows) without over-explaining concepts Claude already knows. The progressive disclosure is well-executed with clear navigation to related resources.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence. It doesn't explain what Strunk's Elements of Style is or why concise writing matters—it jumps straight to actionable guidance. The token warning about the reference file shows awareness of context budget.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, actionable guidance throughout: specific rules numbered and bolded for emphasis, an LLM-ism catalog with exact patterns and fixes, a clear sharpening workflow with numbered steps, and a simple test ('Can you remove this sentence without losing meaning?').

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The sharpening workflow is clearly sequenced (read → cut → scan → verify) with an explicit validation step ('Verify nothing was lost'). The limited context strategy provides a clear 3-step process for constrained situations. The test at the end serves as a simple checkpoint.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent structure with clear overview, well-organized sections, and one-level-deep references to external files (elements-of-style.md, RECIPE.md, related skills). The warning about token consumption for the reference file is particularly well-signaled.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
tslateman/duet
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.