research
Systematic technical investigation—evidence gathering, option comparison, and actionable recommendations. Use when the user asks to "research X", "investigate Y", "look into Z", "compare X vs Y", "how does X work", or needs analysis of libraries, APIs, frameworks, or architectural approaches.
74
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The skill's Research Workflow and the Research-recipe Worker 1 explicitly direct the agent to perform WebSearch/WebFetch of public web pages and community discussions (e.g., HN, Reddit) in SKILL.md and RECIPE.md, and to read/interpret those sources to inform recommendations, which exposes the agent to untrusted third‑party content that could enable indirect prompt injection.
- Repository
- tslateman/duet
- Commit
c3b1fc2
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.