Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured audit checklist with concrete commands, specific detection patterns, and a clear triaged reporting flow. Its only real weakness is that the guidance is weighted toward detection rather than executable remediation steps.
Suggestions
For each finding category, add a one-line concrete remediation step (e.g. 'revert with `git checkout -- <file>`') to push actionability toward copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before reporting (e.g. confirm flagged 'unexpected' files are truly not in the plan) to strengthen the workflow feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives concrete commands and patterns with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and explicitly directs terseness ('Be terse. Name files and line numbers.'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides executable commands (`git diff --stat`) and concrete detection patterns (`console.log`, `print()`, `*.tmp`, file names like fixture/seed/mock), but much of the guidance is detection-oriented rather than copy-paste fix steps, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (Blast Radius through Plan Criteria) flows into a triaged Report, with explicit verification-by-reading and 'skip empty categories' checkpoints; only minor validation gaps keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill with no external references, organized into clearly headed sections, so the simple-skill exception lets it score 5 for well-organized structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |