Conciseness

The body is dense operational rule-content with no concept-explaining padding ("Over-editing is failure, equal to under-editing", "Most polish is subtraction"), but a few rules are restated across sections (the author's-own-draft per-sentence list appears in Core Stance and again in Output) and several bullets are overlong compound sentences (the "A piece has a speaker" bullet) that could be trimmed.

Actionability

The Mode Picker routes each ask to a named file ("Contains Chinese characters (default prose) loads `references/write-zh.md`"), the Punctuation Gate block is executable after one explicitly documented substitution ("Replace `<skill-base-dir>` with the installed Write skill or Waza dispatcher directory"), and the gate script exists in scripts/ and passes a smoke test; the Gotchas table maps concrete observed failures to concrete rules.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is clear (Pre-flight 1-2-3, Mode Picker, mode procedures, Hard Rules, Punctuation Gate, Output contract with explicit "Done when" criteria) and validation is explicit and mandatory ("Before returning any produced text ... resolve the checker across install layouts and run it", "Fix every finding while preserving meaning"), with feedback loops in Gotchas ("Re-review the fix diff itself"), a Document Review checklist, and batch-edit reconciliation; the batch-operation validation cap does not trigger because validation is present.

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a routing hub whose every referenced path resolves in the bundle (all 10 references/*.md files plus scripts/check-punctuation.sh verified present), references are one level deep with only well-signaled lateral sibling pointers (e.g., write-technical.md -> write-product-localization.md), and each mode row names exactly which file to load and when.

Specificity

"Rewrites and polishes Chinese or English prose, technical instructions, and product copy" names the domain and the when-clause adds several concrete actions ("drafting, editing, localizing, or cutting AI tone"), fitting the several-specific-actions anchor; it is not 5 because the body's own mode table (document review, paragraph coherence, tweet/social posts, bilingual drift checks) shows coverage gaps.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Rewrites and polishes Chinese or English prose, technical instructions, and product copy") and when with concrete trigger phrases ("Use when drafting, editing, localizing, or cutting AI tone"), matching the anchor-5 good-example structure exactly; the when-clause is explicit and specific, not weakly implied.

Trigger Term Quality

The description carries natural user phrasings ("drafting", "editing", "localizing", "cutting AI tone") with good coverage, but the description field itself omits common variations users say ("proofread", "rewrite", "review this document", "推特/tweet") that the skill's own when_to_use field and body modes demonstrate.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The explicit exclusion boundary ("Not for code comments or commit messages") and the bilingual/AI-tone niche keep it mostly distinct with minimal conflict risk, but the generic trigger verbs "drafting, editing" carry minor overlap risk with closely related writing skills, fitting anchor 4 rather than the narrow-niche anchor 5.