Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable presentation skill with concrete examples and Twenty-specific conventions throughout. It is held back by some over-specified markdown formatting detail, no explicit validation checkpoints in the retrieval workflow, and all content being inline rather than progressively disclosed.
Suggestions
Tighten the Table Alignment section by dropping the markdown marker syntax explanation and consolidating the favicon/icon bullets to the cases that actually matter.
Move the Field Labels mapping and detailed date/Table Alignment rules into a reference file (e.g. references/formatting.md), keeping SKILL.md focused on the retrieval workflow and response shape.
Add an explicit verification step in the Retrieval Workflow, e.g. confirm retrieved records match the requested filter/sort before formatting the response.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most of the body is efficient and Twenty-specific (link paths, label mappings, date policy), but the Table Alignment section over-specifies markdown alignment marker syntax (':---', '---:', ':---:') and favicon/icon handling that Claude already knows and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-ready guidance: the exact show-page path '/object/:objectNameSingular/:objectRecordId', field-label mappings ('createdAt' → Created), date-format examples, money formatting (EUR 12,450), and complete table/labeled-block examples with realistic data. As an instruction-only skill, the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is highly actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Retrieval Workflow gives a clear ordered sequence ('learn_tools → execute_tool', discover-then-retrieve) with sensible edge-case handling (missing context, no MCP server), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints between retrieval and presentation, matching the 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clear sections with a leading Overview, but all content is inline with no external references; at ~155 lines, reference-style detail (Field Labels mapping, Table Alignment rules, date examples) could be split into reference files, matching 'content that should be separate is inline'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |