Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instruction-only skill body with clear trigger guidance, a properly signaled two-reference progressive-disclosure design, and a concrete output contract with fallback handling. Main weaknesses are duplicated sibling-skill disambiguation with inconsistent naming, and command-level detail that resides wholly in unverifiable references.
Suggestions
State the sibling-skill disambiguation once (either in "When To Use" or "What It Is") and use a single consistent naming convention (`create-app` vs `$create-app`) throughout.
Add a brief verification step after retrieval (e.g., confirm recordReferences and workspace origin are present before building the link table) to close the workflow-clarity gap.
Inline one minimal concrete example of a configured MCP server entry or a formatted record link so the body is actionable even before the references are opened.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the sibling-skill disambiguation is stated twice — "Do not use this skill to scaffold an app (use `create-app`)..." and again in "What It Is" as "Use `$create-app` when..." — with inconsistent naming (`create-app` vs `$create-app`). Not 5: this duplication and naming inconsistency is trimmable; not 3: padding is minor and the rest earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance includes the link template "{workspaceOrigin}/object/{objectNameSingular}/{recordId}", explicit when-to-read conditions for each reference file, and a fallback rule when the workspace origin cannot be resolved. Not 5: the executable detail (MCP server configuration, query specifics) lives entirely in reference files not present in this bundle, leaving minor gaps from the body alone; not 3: what is written is specific and executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered flow (Setup → Retrieval → Output Contract) with an explicit error-recovery path: "If it still cannot be resolved, state that direct record links need the workspace URL instead of inventing a host." Not 5: there is no explicit post-retrieval verification checkpoint before presenting results; not 3: sequence and conditional checkpoints are clearly present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview with two well-signaled, one-level-deep references, each with a precise read condition ("Use `../../references/use-twenty-mcp/setup.md` for workspace URL normalization...", "Before retrieving... read `../../references/use-twenty-mcp/result-formatting.md`"). The core output contract is appropriately kept inline. No bundle files were provided to verify against, but the structure as written matches the anchor: clear overview, appropriately split, easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |