Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built, highly actionable review skill: concrete search strategies per stack, a numbered process with triage and confidence gating, a clear exclusions list, and a full output template, all without teaching things Claude already knows. Remaining gaps are minor -- a re-verification loop over findings, and offloading the stack table or anti-pattern catalog to reference files if the skill grows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries skill-specific, non-obvious content (parity definitions, stack search table, anti-pattern catalog) with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; only minor prose (e.g., Core Principles restating later sections) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready grep patterns ("Grep for `onClick`, `onSubmit`, `onTap`, `Button`, `onPressed`"), exact per-stack API identifiers ("`tool()` in route handlers, `tools` param in `streamText`/`generateText`"), contrasting anti-pattern/correct code examples, and a complete output template cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 0-6 process is clearly sequenced with a real triage checkpoint (incremental vs. full audit, stack identification) and explicit confidence gating ("Low (below 0.60)... Suppress these"), but there is no feedback loop that re-verifies the capability map or noun-test findings. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file body is well-sectioned with each piece placed where the reviewer hits it; at ~184 lines, the stack-specific search strategies and anti-patterns table are plausible candidates for separate reference files, which keeps this below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |