Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is rich in accurate, concrete operational detail with working commands, real one-level-deep references, and a consistent rule set. Its weaknesses are verbosity — large amounts of helper-internals documentation inlined in SKILL.md — and the absence of an explicit end-to-end workflow sequence tying the sections together.
Suggestions
Move helper-internals documentation (Git configuration handling, auth/catalogue projection details, pass-planner allocation rules, image size limits) into a reference file, keeping SKILL.md to the agent-facing rules and commands.
Add a short ordered workflow at the top (install → select Git target → supply context → run → read diagnostics) so the reader doesn't have to reconstruct the sequence from the section order.
Consolidate the engine fallback and effort-level rules into a compact table; the current prose form restates the same failure conditions across multiple paragraphs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Long sections document the helper's internal behavior rather than instructions for the agent — Git clean/autocrlf conversion rules, the auth-executable and catalogue details ('Omitted wire_api and requires_openai_auth retain Codex's responses and false defaults'), and pass-planner byte allocation. This is noticeably verbose with several sections that belong in references, matching anchor 2 rather than the 'mostly efficient, could be tightened' of anchor 3. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste commands cover the common paths (install, local/branch/commit modes, PR-base snippet, engine and model overrides) and the Git-target table is concrete. It falls short of anchor 5 because much of the body is descriptive policy the agent cannot directly execute, and several flag interactions are specified only abstractly. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The run commands and mode table are clear, but the actual sequence — install, select target, supply context, choose engine, interpret diagnostics — is never presented as a sequence and must be assembled from scattered sections. Validation exists (--dry-run, exit codes, preflight checks) but is delegated to the helper rather than given as explicit checkpoints, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Both referenced files exist, are clearly signaled with links, and are one level deep with no nested references, and the referenced scripts are present. However, ~350 lines of tool-behavior specification (engine config projection, runtime boundaries, image limits) are inlined in SKILL.md where they belong in reference files, matching anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |