Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly-written, highly actionable debugging discipline with excellent workflow structure and validation checkpoints. The main room for improvement is adding a couple of literal copy-paste command/code blocks to push actionability from 4 to 5.
Suggestions
Include one or two copy-paste-ready code/command blocks (e.g. a minimal failing-test scaffold or a sample `git bisect run` invocation) to make guidance fully executable rather than descriptive.
The hitl-loop template reference is the only external file; consider whether the bisection or differential-loop techniques also warrant small referenceable snippets to keep the overview even leaner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and opinionated with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; every line is load-bearing (e.g. the `[DEBUG-a4f2]` tagging rationale), matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, numbered techniques and specific commands (git bisect run, performance.now, the hitl-loop template) rather than vague direction, but centers on guidance more than copy-paste-ready code blocks, landing above the midpoint rather than at the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (red-capable/deterministic/fast/agent-runnable), feedback loops for error recovery ('stop if you jump to a hypothesis'), and a Phase 6 cleanup checklist — matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview body with a single, clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference to the real, executable scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh; content is appropriately split with no nested references, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |