Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured persona definition: concrete detection patterns, numeric confidence calibration, and explicit exclusions keep it actionable and lean, and the short single-file body is appropriately organized. The main gaps are minor — an empty findings example in the JSON output format and a few rhetorical flourishes that could be trimmed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence — no explanations of basic concepts — and every section carries detection criteria ("Interfaces with one implementor, factories for a single type"), matching 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed'. Not 5: occasional flavor text ("not because they're wrong today, but because they'll cost disproportionately tomorrow"; "Code that isn't called isn't an asset; it's a maintenance liability") adds tokens without adding guidance; not 3: these are minor, not 'unnecessary explanations'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each hunt category gives concrete detection patterns ("more than two levels of delegation", "Boolean variables without is/has/should prefixes"), calibration gives numeric thresholds (0.80+, 0.60-0.79), and the output format is a complete executable JSON example — matching 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'. Not 5: the findings array is shown empty, with no example finding object showing how to encode a concrete issue; not 3: guidance is concrete and specific, not pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow (hunt -> calibrate confidence -> suppress <0.60 -> emit JSON) is coherent and unambiguous for this single-task skill, with confidence calibration acting as an explicit checkpoint, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. Not 5: the sequence is conveyed through section ordering rather than an explicit step list, and no error-recovery loop is described; not 3: there are no real validation gaps — the task is read-only review. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is ~39 lines with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and no external references needed, so per the rubric's simple-skill guideline 'progressive disclosure can score 5 with just well-organized sections' — and the sections (hunting for, calibration, exclusions, output format) are well-organized and navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |