Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with concrete commands, exact tool names, and ready-to-use templates, and its routing workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints. It is slightly redundant and monolithic, with some content that could be tightened or split.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated "do not create worktrees" rule into one authoritative statement and reference it, removing the three other restatements.
Consider moving the child-prompt template and status-tracking table into a referenced reference file so the SKILL.md overview stays shorter and progressive disclosure is one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — lists, commands, and templates with no padding about concepts Claude already knows — but the "no worktree" rule is restated across Core Contract, Thread Tool Boundary, Safety, and Success Criteria, and could be tightened into a single canonical statement. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives exact commands ($orchestrator on/off/status), namespaced tool names (codex_app.create_thread, send_message_to_thread, etc.), and copy-paste-ready child-prompt and status-table templates, providing concrete executable guidance rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Routing Rules is a clearly numbered 9-step sequence with explicit checkpoints (if found / if not found), the Thread Tool Boundary gives a stop-and-report guard when tools are missing, and Success Criteria serves as a checklist; conditionals and error handling are explicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into well-labeled sections, but it is a single monolithic file over 50 lines with no external references or bundle files, and parts (child prompt template, status table) are inline rather than split out for staged discovery. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |