CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

registry-changelog

Author and verify Plate registry changelog entries for user-visible registry UI, kit, example, and registry metadata changes.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is exemplary: lean, executable, and well-structured with explicit validation checkpoints and a clear closeout checklist. It assumes Claude's intelligence while providing complete runnable commands and a precise frontmatter contract.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it jumps straight into scope, source paths, the frontmatter contract, and runnable commands with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for create, regenerate, verify, and test, plus a complete MDX frontmatter contract table and a concrete example entry covering the common case.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Closeout section gives a clear sequenced checklist with explicit validation checkpoints ('--check passes', 'focused generator tests run when...'), and the Commands section sequences create → write → check → test with feedback loops for the batch/destructive generate-and-verify operation.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

For a self-contained single-purpose skill with no external bundle files, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Source, When Required, Authoring Contract, Commands, Closeout) with no nested references and easy navigation, matching the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and clearly scoped to a distinct niche, with a concrete what and an implied when. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and limited natural trigger-term coverage, which cap completeness and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when a task changes user-visible Plate registry output such as UI components, kits, examples, or registry metadata.'

Broaden trigger-term coverage with synonyms users actually say, like 'changelog entry', 'registry release notes', or the relevant file path under apps/www/src/registry.

Keep the concrete action enumeration but consider separating 'author' and 'verify' into distinct verbs to make the capability set more comprehensive.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the concrete actions 'Author and verify' and enumerates specific artifact types ('registry UI, kit, example, and registry metadata changes'), but does not enumerate multiple distinct authoring/verification actions, so it stops short of fully comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does ('Author and verify Plate registry changelog entries...') and implies the when via the artifact list, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so the when is only weakly explicit rather than concrete.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant domain terms ('registry UI', 'kit', 'example', 'registry metadata'), but the natural phrases a user would say are thin — there are no common synonyms or file-path-style triggers beyond 'registry changelog', and nothing like 'changelog entry' phrasing users would actually invoke.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Plate registry changelog' niche is fairly distinct and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, though 'registry metadata changes' has minor overlap with neighboring changeset/docs skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
udecode/plate
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.