Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable gate-loop recipe with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit failure-routing feedback loop, weakened only by placeholder-dependent commands and a couple of mildly explanatory passages.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-focused with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only the Setup status definitions and boundary prose are mildly explanatory and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands are provided (autoresearch-cli setup-plan/doctor/serve/next/log, bun check, playwright), but they rely on placeholders like <gate command>, <gate-name>, and <suite> that require substitution, so they are not fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The setup-plan to doctor to serve to next to log sequence is clear, with an explicit feedback loop (fail twice with the same signal then route to slate-patch) and a doctor validation step; minor checkpoint gaps keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into Boundary, Setup, Commands, and Handoff sections with no nested references and a single self-contained file; at roughly 65 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold, holding it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |