Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured stabilization loop with concrete command routing, explicit validation checkpoints, feedback loops, and a completion checklist; the only weakness is minor inferential load in phrases like "narrowest existing behavior gate".
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~44-line body with no concept over-explanation; "This is an expert override" and the slate-ar-perfect aside add genuinely useful routing context rather than padding, fitting the lean/efficient score-5 anchor better than the score-4 'minor over-explanation' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance via named commands (slate-ar-status, slate-ar-gate, slate-patch, tdd) with a numbered procedure, but terms like "the narrowest existing behavior gate" still require inference, matching score-4 rather than the copy-paste-ready score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops ("if the same valid gate fails twice, stop gating and fix", "rerun the focused gate after each fix", "broaden only after focused proof is green"), plus a Completion checklist — matching the score-5 anchor; the stabilization loop is not a destructive batch operation, so the cap-to-3 rule does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed and clear section headers (Contract, Completion, Handoff); per the simple-skills note this qualifies for a score-5 on progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |