Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced stabilization loop with real validation checkpoints and feedback structure — the body is where this skill's quality lives. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a single concrete gate-command example to anchor 'run the narrowest existing behavior gate'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 45 lean lines where every line carries routing or decision information — no concept explanations, no padding, no repetition. Sections (Contract, Completion, Handoff) each add distinct value, and it assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and specific throughout: named tools ('slate-ar-status', 'slate-ar-gate', 'slate-patch', 'autogoal', 'tdd'), explicit decision rules ('if the same valid gate fails twice, stop gating and fix with slate-patch'), and a numbered procedure. Falls short of 5 because 'run the narrowest existing behavior gate' never shows an example gate command, so Claude must discover the concrete invocations elsewhere. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence with genuine feedback loops: gate fails twice -> switch to fixing, 'rerun the focused gate after each fix', and 'broaden to the next relevant gate only after focused proof is green', plus an explicit Completion stop-list. Held below 5 because 'green repeatedly enough for the risk' leaves the required repeat count implicit rather than a concrete checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent), and the body references only sibling skills rather than nested files. Per the simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections (Contract, Completion, Handoff) are sufficient, and the split is appropriate with no monolithic inline bulk. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |