Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with clear gated workflows and concrete templates, but it is a long monolith with some redundant re-listing of the decision taxonomy and no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Extract the status.json schema, plan-shape template, and decision/apply-rule taxonomies into reference files and link them one level deep to shrink the inline body.
Dedupe the decision labels: define them once and have the Apply, Dashboard, and Final-output sections reference that single list instead of restating each rule.
Tighten prose in the Flow Modes and Core Take sections, which state policy that is later restated in the Start/Completion Gates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but at ~530 lines it repeats the decision taxonomy across Decisions, Apply rules, Dashboard rows, and Final output, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance throughout — a real autogoal script invocation, exact file paths, a status.json schema, plan-shape and output templates that are copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step process is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: Start Gates, Planning/Apply "must/must not" lists, and Apply revalidation (re-read plan, recompute classification, confirm validity). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned but a monolithic single file with no bundle references; content that could be split (plan shapes, status.json schema, decision taxonomies) is kept inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |