Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable and well-gated workflow document: exact paths, structured state shapes, hunk-level classification labels, and explicit validation before and after mutation. The weak spot is progressive disclosure — a single long file with zero bundle references where the worked example and templates belong in separate files.
Suggestions
Move the Potion Example section into a references/ file (e.g. references/potion-example.md) and keep only a pointer plus the minimal in-line example in SKILL.md.
Extract the Plan Shape, dashboard payload, and Final Output templates into a references/plan-templates.md file so SKILL.md reads as an overview of modes and rules.
Dedupe the acceptance-before-apply and planning-must-not-mutate rules, which currently appear in Flow Modes, Planning Mode, Apply Mode, Start Gates, and Completion Gates — state each once and cross-reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse imperative prose with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the core invariants ("user acceptance required before apply", "planning must not mutate target source") are restated across Flow Modes, Planning Mode, Apply Mode, Start Gates, and Completion Gates — minor tightening is possible. Not 5 because of that repetition; not 3 because nothing is padded or over-explained. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact state paths (.plate-ui-sync/status.json), concrete JSON and status shapes, command dispatch examples, plan and output templates, and enumerated hunk-classification and decision labels a reader can apply verbatim. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints appropriate to a mutating/batch skill: start gates, re-read → recompute → revalidate before mutation, review verdicts, focused verification after apply, and check-complete.mjs completion gates. Not 4 because validation is explicit at every risky step, forming feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with headers, but the ~530-line body is monolithic with no reference files at all — the Potion worked example, plan-shape template, and output templates are inline content that clearly belongs in separate files. Fits the 3 anchor (structure present, content that should be separate is inline); not 2 because navigation via headers is easy and nothing is buried. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |