Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with explicit validation and feedback loops, scoring 3 on actionability and workflow clarity. It loses points on conciseness due to heavy repetition of its core principle and duplicated hook blocks, and on progressive disclosure because everything lives in one ~370-line file with no reference split.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'test requirements not implementation' guidance into one authoritative section and cross-reference it elsewhere, and de-duplicate the pre/post extension-hook blocks into a shared procedure, to tighten conciseness toward 3.
Move the example checklist types, anti-examples, and category structure into a separate reference file (e.g., references/checklist-patterns.md) linked from a concise overview, improving progressive disclosure toward 3.
Keep the worked correct/incorrect examples but trim the overlapping restatements so each prohibition pattern appears once with its strongest illustration.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operationally dense and does not explain basic concepts Claude lacks, but it restates the 'test requirements, not implementation' principle roughly six times (Purpose, Core Principle, HOW TO WRITE, ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED, REQUIRED PATTERNS, Anti-Examples) with overlapping examples, and duplicates the pre/post extension-hook blocks almost verbatim — fitting 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete commands ('check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json'), exact file paths, copy-paste-ready hook output templates, a precise item format ('CHK### <requirement item>'), append-vs-create numbering rules, and worked correct/incorrect examples by quality dimension — matching 'Fully executable code/commands; specific examples; copy-paste ready' for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven Execution Steps are clearly sequenced (Setup → Clarify → Understand → Load context → Generate → Structure → Report) with explicit validation checkpoints: silent YAML-parse-failure handling, file-existence branching, and a clarification feedback loop (Q1–Q3 with capped Q4/Q5 escalation), matching 'Clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned with clear '##' headings but is a ~370-line monolithic single file with no bundle to offload into; content that could be separate (example checklist types, anti-examples, category structure) is all inline, fitting 'Some structure but could be better organized … content that should be separate is inline' rather than the one-level-deep reference pattern of score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |