Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear, actionable four-step workflow with concrete MCP tool parameters, well-organized for a short self-contained skill. Its main weakness is redundancy: the one-concept-per-query rule and the usage triggers are each repeated multiple times.
Suggestions
State the single-concept-per-query rule once (e.g., in Step 3) and drop the duplicate 'Be specific' and 'One topic per query' guideline entries.
Trim the 'When to Use This Skill' section to a few lines or remove it, since the frontmatter description already covers the same triggers in more detail.
Add a brief fallback for Step 2 when resolution returns no close match (e.g., retry resolve-library-id with a more specific name or fall back to web search) to close the workflow's only gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The single-concept-per-query rule is stated three times (Step 3's "Combined queries dilute ranking…", the "Be specific" guideline, and the "One topic per query" guideline), and the "When to Use This Skill" section largely restates the frontmatter description's triggers. Mostly efficient, but the repetition could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable MCP guidance: exact tool names ("resolve-library-id", "query-docs") with their parameters ("libraryName", "query", "libraryId"), an example ID format ("/vercel/next.js"), and selection criteria. Minor gaps — no example of interpreting results or fallback parameters — keep it below fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (Resolve → Select → Fetch → Use) with selection criteria acting as a checkpoint. It is a read-only skill so no validation cap applies, but there is no feedback loop for edge cases like resolution returning no good match. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A ~50-line, self-contained, single-purpose skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections (When to Use, How to Fetch Documentation, Guidelines); per the rubric's simple-skill note this warrants a 5 with no external references needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |