Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a clear, actionable, well-structured workflow for fetching library documentation via Context7, with concrete tool names and parameters and a sensible four-step sequence. Minor redundancy with the frontmatter and the lack of a full call-syntax example or error-recovery guidance prevent the actionability and conciseness dimensions from reaching the top anchor.
Suggestions
Remove the opening line that restates the frontmatter description, and consolidate the "one topic per query" guidance so it appears in only one place to tighten conciseness.
Add a concrete example showing the full tool-call syntax (e.g., a resolve-library-id followed by a query-docs call with sample arguments) to make the guidance copy-paste ready.
Add a brief validation/error-recovery note (e.g., what to do if resolution returns no good match or query-docs returns shallow results) to push workflow clarity toward the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the opening line ("use Context7 to fetch current documentation instead of relying on training data") restates the frontmatter and the "one topic per query" guidance is repeated across Step 3 and Guidelines, keeping it just below the fully lean score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It names the exact MCP tools (resolve-library-id, query-docs) with their parameters (libraryName, query, libraryId) and a concrete example ID ("/vercel/next.js"), giving mostly executable guidance; the minor gap is that no full call-syntax example is shown, so it does not reach the copy-paste-ready score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (resolve → select → fetch → use) with selection criteria as a soft checkpoint; because the operation is read-only doc fetching, the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply, but the absence of explicit validation or error-recovery feedback loops keeps it below the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is a single well-organized file with clear section headers (When to Use, How to Fetch with numbered subsections, Guidelines), satisfying the simple-skill exception for well-structured content without external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |