Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The core browse/QA material is excellent — dense, executable, with well-sequenced workflows and built-in verification — but it is buried in a 668-line monolith where operational boilerplate (telemetry, onboarding prompts, style rules) consumes token budget and the full command reference is inlined rather than split into reference files. Extracting the peripheral protocols and the command reference into separate bundle files would substantially improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the ~150-line command reference to a references/COMMANDS.md and keep only the most common commands inline, trimming the body to an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep links.
Extract the operational protocols (telemetry run-last block, contributor-mode template, plan-mode footer) into a shared preamble/reference file so they stop consuming the skill's token budget.
Add brief error-recovery guidance for failed browse commands or assertions (e.g., what to check when a snapshot ref is stale or a goto times out) to close the workflow-clarity gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 180 lines of the 668-line body are tangential to the skill's purpose — telemetry onboarding dialogs, the "Boil the Lake" essay intro, proactive-behavior prompting scripts, a "Voice" style section, contributor-mode templates, and a plan-mode footer — which matches anchor 2's 'several unnecessary explanations or padded sections' better than anchor 3's 'mostly efficient'. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The QA workflows are fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash ($B goto, $B snapshot -i, $B fill @e3 "$TEST_EMAIL", $B is visible ".dashboard") covering the common cases (login, deployment checks, uploads, dialogs, responsive, chain), and template placeholders (SKILL_NAME, OUTCOME) are explicitly instructed — matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is clear (preamble → SETUP check before any browse command → task workflows) with explicit verification checkpoints (snapshot -D diffs, is assertions, console error checks), but there is no error-recovery guidance for when a command or assertion fails, leaving it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and everything is inlined in one monolithic file: the ~150-line command reference, the telemetry protocol, and contributor-mode templates are content that clearly belongs in separate files, matching anchor 3 ('content that should be separate is inline') despite decent section headers; it avoids anchor 2 because structure and navigation within the file are reasonable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |