Conciseness

The ~65-line body is lean and assumes competence: no concept explanations, no padding, dense imperative instructions like "Back up only if a step can lose the only copy; delete the backup after checking the result." It falls short of anchor 5 only through minor redundancy (the agents/install paragraph restates "Copying only the skill folder… supplies none of their harness agent files" then "Installing `orch` alone does not install Jarvis") and a few over-compressed sentences (the "judge each folder `kendex project list` prints, a `(worktree of [MAIN])` line" phrasing) that could be tightened for clarity.

Actionability

Some guidance is genuinely executable — the exact mailbox probe command ("lane-mail events --item overseer --box to-overseer") with exit-code interpretation, "kendex refresh", and the one-line persona offer procedure — but key steps point to artifacts absent from the bundle: the install step routes to README.md#install, the persona steps depend on persona.md, and the routing table sends 7 tasks to workflows/*.md files, none of which exist here. That matches anchor 3 (some concrete guidance but incomplete, missing key details) rather than 4.

Workflow Clarity

The reachable-repositories procedure is the strongest part: a concrete probe, explicit branch interpretation (exit 0 reachable; anything else unreachable with its cause; orch-without-mailbox → "refresh needed" offer), and a defined reporting step. However, the destructive "Cleanup and backups" section ("Remove all unused code, files, keys, secret-store entries, databases, records and settings from every holder in the same change") has no explicit validation or verification loop before removal — validation is only implicit ("after checking the result") or deferred to a reference — so per the destructive-operation cap workflow clarity cannot exceed 3.

Progressive Disclosure

The structure is a good overview-plus-routing pattern: a task-to-file table with clearly signaled one-level-deep references, and 11 of the referenced references/*.md files exist. But scored against the actual bundle, 8 of the in-bundle targets are missing (README.md, persona.md, and all seven workflows/*.md), and references/ holds two files (control-host-events.md, long-session.md) the body never points to. Navigation is better organized than anchor 3's "references present but not clearly signaled" yet the broken links are more than the "minor organization gaps" of anchor 4.

Specificity

The description names several concrete domains ("computer, browser, accounts, messages or records") and concrete session-lifecycle operations ("starting, handing off or ending a long session"), but the core action remains the generic "acting for the user". It matches anchor 3 (domain plus a couple of actions, not comprehensive) rather than 2, since the session-lifecycle clause names real operations; it falls short of 4 because no distinct capability of the skill itself is enumerated.

Completeness

The "when" is explicit and multi-faceted ("Load when acting for the user… or when starting, handing off or ending a long session"), but the "what" — what the skill actually does — is only vaguely implied by "acting for the user"; the capability statement lives in the summary field, not the description. Anchor 2 ("only 'when' present without 'what'") nearly fits, but the delegation phrasing weakly implies the what, so this sits at 3; it cannot reach 4 because the what is never stated.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing keywords are well covered: "computer", "browser", "accounts", "messages", "records", "session", "handing off" — phrases a user would plausibly say when delegating. It misses common synonyms and variations (e.g., email, login, passwords, handover), which keeps it below anchor 5 but comfortably above anchor 3.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The delegated-assistant framing plus session-handoff triggers carve a recognizable niche, but the enumerated surfaces ("computer, browser, accounts, messages or records") span the territory of browser-automation, communication and session-management skills, creating real overlap risk. It is more specific than anchor 2's "very broad" but not the "minor overlap risk" of anchor 4.