Conciseness

The ~15-line body contains only instructions, three commands, one dense policy line ("Fix what a finding reports; never widen a lane's exclusions to clear it."), and pointers that delegate rather than restate ("Lanes, scopes, settings, output and exit codes are in `preflight --help`."), with no concept explanations. Every token earns its place, matching the anchor 5 example of lean, competence-assuming content.

Actionability

The three copy-paste-ready commands cover all common invocation modes, each annotated with what it scans ("--staged # staged changes (pre-commit)", "--all # every tracked file, every line"), plus a concrete remediation rule. Fully executable and covering the common cases per anchor 5; not 4 because there is no meaningful gap in the executable guidance.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is explicit ("Run preflight in the validate step, before the project's own validation command") with a clear remediation policy (fix findings, never widen exclusions), but the fix-then-re-run feedback loop is only implicit rather than stated as a checkpoint. Anchor 4 ("Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps"); not 5 because no explicit re-run/until-clean checkpoint is given, and not 3 because positioning and remediation are both stated.

Progressive Disclosure

A lean overview delegating detail to `preflight --help`, the real one-level-deep [references/lanes.md](references/lanes.md) (signaled with the exact topics it covers), and [README.md](README.md) for hook/CI wiring — but README.md is not present in the bundle, so that link dangles. Anchor 4 ("Good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps"); not 5 because of the broken README.md reference, and not 3 because the structure and signaling are otherwise strong.

Specificity

"Load to run, tune, or debug preflight." names the domain (preflight) but the actions "run, tune, or debug" are generic verbs applicable to any tool, and no concrete capability is described. This matches anchor 2 ("Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic"); not 3 because not even one capability-specific action (what preflight checks) is stated, and not 1 because a domain and verbs are named.

Completeness

There is no "Use when..." clause or explicit trigger guidance (which caps completeness at 3 per the guidelines), and the "what" is vague: what preflight actually does (diff-scoped fail-only checks) is stated only in the separate "summary" field, not in the description. Anchor 2 ("Has a vague 'what' and no 'when'") fits best; not 3 because the "what" is not clear, and not 1 because a named domain and actions are present.

Trigger Term Quality

The keywords "run", "tune", "debug", and "preflight" capture how a user who already knows the tool would invoke it, but no natural functional phrases a user would say without knowing the name (e.g. "check my changes before committing", "lint the diff") appear. Some relevant keywords but missing common variations, per anchor 3; not 4 because the natural functional phrasings are entirely absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Load to run, tune, or debug preflight" is anchored to a distinct tool name, so it is unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, but with zero domain or function content it is indistinguishable from any other named-tool skill and "run/tune/debug" are fully generic. Anchor 3 ("Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills"); not 4 because nothing beyond the name separates it from other tool-operating skills.