Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered process skill: clearly sequenced phases with strong validation checkpoints, real feedback loops, and exemplary one-level-deep progressive disclosure verified against the actual bundle. The two minor weaknesses are occasional restatement of already-stated rules and command abstraction that, while explicitly justified by the stack-agnostic design, leaves most phases guidance-shaped rather than executable.
Suggestions
Cut restated rules, e.g. trim the Phase 4 severity-vs-domain worked example to one sentence since 'Order every GAP by severity first, across all domains' already conveys it.
Add one concrete example command set for a single common stack (e.g. a JS example of the Phase 2 baseline commands) so the 'or equivalent' pattern has an executable anchor without losing stack-agnosticism.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, rule-focused body with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and it cross-references instead of repeating (Phase 5 step 7 points to Definition of done; Documentation sync explicitly avoids restating CI rules). Minor over-explanation remains, e.g. Phase 4's worked example ('a High-severity Security GAP goes before a Medium-severity Performance GAP... because severity outranks domain') restates the rule just stated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete elements throughout — example queries ('tessl_search "accessibility WCAG"'), an exact fetch URL, file paths (tessl.json, docs/audit/baseline-YYYY-MM-DD.json), a filled example baseline row, fixed status vocabulary, and commit grammar — but most executable commands are abstracted to 'run the project's own build, test, lint, and dependency-audit commands'. That flexibility is explicitly justified by the stack-agnostic design, yet it keeps most phases short of copy-paste readiness. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0-6 are explicitly ordered with a mode-selection table with entry conditions, a Definition of done with exact verification criteria (CI green for that exact commit, live re-measure, no baseline regression), a guard-test-first feedback loop ('confirm it fails on the pre-fix commit'), failure handling ('read only the failing step's log'), explicit fallbacks for unreachable sources and missing reviewers, and literal per-domain checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that splits all detail into 10 reference files, each clearly signaled by a markdown link at the point of need with deep anchors where relevant. Verified against the actual bundle: every referenced path exists, sibling references cross-link without pass-through stubs, and no content that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |