Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an unusually dense, competent API reference: executable code for most exports, lean prose, and real validation/repair-loop guidance. Its weaknesses are structural — no end-to-end workflow sequence for the schema→catalog→prompt→render pipeline, and everything (including the long experimental section and export table) is inlined in one file with no progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add a short ordered workflow (define schema → define catalog → buildUserPrompt → validate/repair with validateSpec/autoFixSpec) with explicit validation checkpoints so the reference sections hang off a real sequence.
Move the Experimental Decision-Model Composition rules and the Key Exports table into references/ files (e.g., references/composition.md, references/exports.md) and link them from a brief overview section in SKILL.md.
Complete the placeholder code — the defineSchema example's empty s.object({...}) bodies should show real field definitions so the primary getting-started snippet is copy-paste runnable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean API reference that assumes competence — no space is spent explaining what JSON schemas or streaming are. The 'Experimental Decision-Model Composition' section is a dense wall of rules whose sentences could be tightened into scannable bullets, which keeps it at 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' rather than fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Most sections give copy-paste-ready TypeScript with imports (defineCatalog, buildUserPrompt, StateStore, check helpers, resolveElementProps). Minor gaps keep it below fully executable: the defineSchema example contains empty object bodies with only '// Define spec structure' comments, and the visibility 'Syntax' block is illustrative pseudo-syntax rather than runnable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The document is a topic-organized reference rather than a sequenced workflow; there is no ordered process for the main tasks (e.g., schema → catalog → prompt → validate). Some checkpoints exist in isolation (autoFixSpec's repair loop with 'withhold lossy fixes until retries are exhausted', seeds must be valid trees), but validation of risky operations is presented as API facts, not explicit workflow steps, matching 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly headed and navigable, but the entire ~290-line API surface — including the dense experimental composition rules and the Key Exports table — is inlined in SKILL.md with no bundle files to split into. The pointers that do exist ('See packages/core/README.md and /docs/jev') are repo paths rather than clearly-signaled one-level-deep bundle references, fitting 'some structure but could be better organized'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |