Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-structured with a clear sequence and an included type-check validation step. It would benefit from an explicit error-retry loop and a small example-file template to push actionability and workflow clarity to the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with concrete paths and commands; only the mid-paragraph sentence about what examples are 'used for' slightly restates the description and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance (specific directory, generateText/streamText variants, `pnpm type-check:full`) with a minor gap: no template or example of an actual example file's structure. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (review changes → identify → determine model/function → create variants → type-check → fix) with a validation checkpoint, though the fix loop is stated implicitly rather than as an explicit validate→fix→retry cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no bundle files, and organized under one clear section header — meets the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |