Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-sequenced with concrete commands and validation steps for both add and remove workflows. The main gap is minor: an explicit fix-and-re-run feedback loop on test failure and possible extraction of the long file-path/location lists into a reference.
Suggestions
In each workflow's Step 7, add an explicit feedback loop: 'If tests fail, fix the failing case and re-run until green' to lift workflow_clarity from 4 to 5.
Consider moving the multi-provider file-location lists (Step 3 of the add workflow) into a references/ file and linking to it, keeping the core SKILL.md shorter.
Add a short 'Verify exact-match (not substring)' checkpoint callout right after the grep steps in both workflows to reinforce the critical rule inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence throughout (no explanation of what a model ID, provider, or type union is) and uses concrete grep/pnpm commands plus tight code blocks, with the second workflow reusing 'same as Workflow A Step 7' instead of repeating. Every section earns its tokens, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor; it is not the 4 anchor because there are no meaningful over-explanation instances to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: quoted-grep search commands, exact file paths (e.g. 'packages/<provider>/src/*-options.ts'), copy-paste TypeScript type-union and const-array additions, and specific 'pnpm --filter @ai-sdk/<provider> test' commands covering the common add/remove cases. This matches the fully-executable, copy-paste-ready anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both workflows are clearly sequenced in 7 numbered steps with explicit validation checkpoints ('Step 7: Run Tests') and a Critical Rules checklist covering exact-match, sort-order, and no-unrelated-changes for the batch operation. It sits below 5 because the error-recovery feedback loop is only implied ('run tests') rather than spelled out as 'if tests fail, fix and re-run'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized with distinct labeled sections (Critical Rules, <adding-new-model>, <removing-obsolete-model>) and no nested external references, and no bundle files exist to validate. It is above 3 (clear sectioning, nothing buried) but below 5 because at ~185 lines the example-path enumeration and per-provider location lists could plausibly be split into a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |