The body is information-dense with every line earning its place—mapping skills to situations, routing rules, and constraints—without padding or explaining concepts Claude already knows.

Routing guidance is concrete and specific: named skills (/grill-with-docs, /handoff, /prototype, /to-spec), explicit decision branches, file paths (.scratch/<feature>/issues/), and a token-window threshold, giving copy-ready actionable direction.

Multi-step flows are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints (e.g., refuse to speculate until a tight feedback loop exists; do not compact before /to-tickets) and feedback loops for risky routing decisions.

Content is organized into clear, navigable sections (main flow, on-ramps, vocabulary, crossing sessions, standalone, precondition) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to other skills and no monolithic wall of text or nested references.

Names the domain (skill/process routing) and one concrete action ("询问当前情境适合哪个技能或流程"), but does not list multiple specific concrete actions, so it falls short of the level-3 anchor.

It states what the skill does (route to the right skill/process), but the "when" is only implied with no explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 2 per the rubric guideline.

No natural user-facing trigger keywords appear; the phrase describes the mechanism rather than terms a user would naturally say, and there is no "Use when..." clause to surface natural triggers.

It carves a clear niche as the repo's single router, but without explicit triggers it could still overlap with other router-style or meta skills, so it does not reach the clearly-distinct level 3.