Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, well-sequenced iterative workflow with a strong validation gate, but it is presented as an unsectioned prose wall and lacks a concrete worked example of a round. Adding headers and one sample round would improve both organization and actionability.
Suggestions
Break the prose into labeled sections (e.g., 'Design tree', 'Rounds & frontier', 'Facts vs. decisions', 'Termination') so the structure is scannable.
Add a short worked example showing one round (numbered questions with recommended answers and the resulting frontier recompute) to make the procedure concrete.
Tighten the repeated frontier-recompute explanation across paragraphs two and three into a single statement to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and defines only its own skill-specific terms (design tree, frontier), but the frontier-recompute logic is restated across the second and third paragraphs, so it is 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete procedural guidance ('给每个问题编号并提供推荐答案，然后等待用户回答', dispatch sub-agents for facts, defer dependent questions), but offers no worked example of a single round, leaving the guidance specific yet not fully copy-paste concrete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The round-based process is clearly sequenced with a feedback loop (user answers reshape the tree and recompute the frontier) and an explicit validation gate ('Frontier 为空时 session 才结束' and '在用户确认已经达成共同理解前，不要采取行动'), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is a single undifferentiated block of prose with no section headers; for a sub-50-line skill with no external references, a 3 requires well-organized sections, which are absent here. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |