Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly sequenced, highly actionable debugging methodology with explicit validation gates and checklists at every phase, and it appropriately pulls the one mechanical artifact out to a real script file. Its only real weakness is occasional rhetorical padding that slightly undercuts token efficiency.
Suggestions
Trim rhetorical emphasis lines ('要强硬、要有创造力、拒绝放弃' and similar) to tighten the body without losing the directive force.
Consider moving the 10-item 'Ways to construct one' list into a reference file so the core Phase 1 narrative stays lean, with the list as a one-level-deep pointer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly assumes Claude's competence without explaining basics, but rhetorical emphasis ('要强硬、要有创造力、拒绝放弃', '盯着代码看多久都救不了你') and some restated phase rationale add padding that could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance throughout — a ranked 10-item list of loop constructions, tagged debug-log prefixes like '[DEBUG-a4f2]', git bisect, and a real referenced harness 'scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh' — well beyond abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six phases are explicitly sequenced with per-phase completion checklists and hard gates ('没有 red-capable command，就没有 Phase 2', '在 reproduce 并 minimise 之前不要继续'), plus a cleanup checklist and feedback loop in Phase 6. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear phase sections with a single one-level-deep external reference (scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh) that is clearly signaled and confirmed to exist in the bundle; there is no nested-reference indirection. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |