Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An unusually disciplined process skill: a clearly sequenced six-phase workflow with explicit validation checkpoints, checklists, and feedback loops, plus fully actionable concrete artifacts (hypothesis format, debug-tag convention, a real HITL script). The only notable gaps are a handful of trimmable coaching sentences and the absence of any one-level-deep reference files for the long enumeration sections.
Suggestions
Move the ten 'Ways to construct one' methods (or the perf-branch guidance in Phase 4) into a reference file such as references/loop-methods.md, keeping a short ranked summary in SKILL.md with clearly signaled links — this would push progressive disclosure toward the ideal overview-plus-references shape.
Trim purely motivational sentences (e.g. "要强硬、要有创造力、拒绝放弃", "bug 就修好了 90%") or compress them into the instructional lines they reinforce, saving tokens without losing the discipline.
Consider adding a brief opening line stating the phase map (1 loop → 2 reproduce → 3 hypothesise → 4 instrument → 5 fix → 6 cleanup) so the overall sequence is graspable before diving into Phase 1's long core section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and imperative throughout — it never explains concepts Claude already knows (no explanation of what git bisect or Playwright is) and mostly every line instructs: "给每条 debug log 加唯一 prefix，例如 [DEBUG-a4f2]", "一次只改变一个变量". A few coaching/emphasis sentences could be trimmed ("要强硬、要有创造力、拒绝放弃", "这就是这个 skill 的核心", "一个 30 秒且 flaky 的 loop 几乎不比没有 loop 好" is borderline motivational rather than instructional), so it sits at anchor 4 (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than anchor 5's every-token-earns-its-place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully actionable: a ranked list of ten concrete loop-construction methods each naming specific tools ("Headless browser script（Playwright / Puppeteer）", "git bisect run", "performance.now()"), a copy-paste hypothesis format template ("If <X> is the cause, then <changing Y> will make the bug disappear"), an executable debug-tag convention ([DEBUG-a4f2] with grep-based cleanup), and a real, complete, runnable script at scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh (verified to exist and be executable). This matches anchor 5's 'specific examples cover the common cases'; it exceeds anchor 4 because the concrete artifacts are complete rather than having gaps — situation-dependent steps (probe placement) are inherently variable, which the rubric accepts. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six explicitly numbered phases, each with an explicit completion criterion or checklist: Phase 1's red-capable/deterministic/fast/agent-runnable checklist, Phase 2's "每个剩余元素都是 load-bearing", Phase 5's fail-then-pass regression sequence, and Phase 6's cleanup checklist ("所有 [DEBUG-...] instrumentation 已移除（grep prefix）"). Validation and feedback loops (red/green signal, re-run original repro, re-validate) are pervasive, matching anchor 5 (clear sequence, explicit validation, feedback loops, checklists) and clearly above anchor 4's 'most checkpoints'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: the body is organized into clear phase sections, and its one bundle reference — "用 scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh 驱动人" — is clearly signaled and points to a real file in the bundle. However, at ~130 lines the SKILL.md inlines content that could arguably live in reference files (the ten construction methods, the perf-branch guidance), and there is no top-level overview/navigation to optional deeper material, so it lands at anchor 4 (good structure, references mostly clear, minor organization gaps) rather than anchor 5's clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |