Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured instruction skill with concrete behavioral guidance and clear ADR gating. Its main defect is progressive disclosure: two referenced format files do not exist, leaving broken navigation links.
Suggestions
Add the missing CONTEXT-FORMAT.md and ADR-FORMAT.md files (or a references/ bundle) so the referenced links resolve; alternatively inline the formats or remove the references.
Add a brief validation/checkpoint step for inline CONTEXT.md updates (e.g., confirm the term is glossary-only with no implementation detail) to strengthen the feedback loop.
Tighten the intro parenthetical contrasting active vs. consumption use, or move it to a one-line note, to reduce verbosity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what a domain model or ADR is), with every section earning its place; not a 5 because the intro's parenthetical distinguishing active vs. consumption use is slightly defensive padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-ready behavioral guidance (quoted challenge phrases like "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y") and a crisp 3-criteria ADR gate; not a 5 because, being instruction-only, some guidance is high-level rather than fully executable steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences behaviors as a session lifecycle with explicit gating criteria for ADRs; not a 5 because there is no explicit validation/checkpoint feedback loop for the inline CONTEXT.md updates. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body signals one-level-deep references to CONTEXT-FORMAT.md and ADR-FORMAT.md, but neither file exists in the bundle, creating broken navigation; not a 3 because the referenced paths are dead ends rather than merely unclear. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |