CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

grilling

围绕计划、decision 或 idea 持续追问用户。适用于用户想对自己的思路做压力测试,或使用任何 “grill” 触发措辞时。

76

Quality

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary compact instruction skill: every token is load-bearing, the workflow has an explicit confirmation gate, and the guidance is concrete enough to act on directly. No bundle files are needed and none are missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a lean ~10 lines with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (one-question-at-a-time, look up facts directly, await confirmation) earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Though code-free, the guidance is concrete and executable — '一次只问一个问题', 'wait for feedback before continuing', 'explore the environment for facts', 'don't act until I confirm' — which fully satisfies the instruction-only exception in the scoring notes.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The process is clearly sequenced (interview each aspect → walk decision-tree branches resolving dependencies → one question with a recommended answer → wait for feedback) and ends with an explicit validation gate ('在我确认...之前,不要采取行动'), giving a clear feedback loop and stopping condition.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; its well-organized short paragraphs satisfy the simple-skills exception that allows a top score without separate bundle files.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-structured description that names its domain, gives an explicit 'use when' trigger, and relies on a distinctive 'grill' keyword. Its only weakness is that it describes a single action rather than enumerating several concrete capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase '持续追问用户' names the core action (questioning the user) and the domain ('计划、decision 或 idea'), but lists only one action rather than multiple concrete capabilities, so it stops at the 'names domain and some actions' anchor rather than the comprehensive list at level 3.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers both 'what' (持续追问用户 around plans/decisions/ideas) and 'when' via an explicit trigger clause ('适用于用户想对自己的思路做压力测试,或使用任何 "grill" 触发措辞时'), satisfying the 'Use when...' requirement that would otherwise cap this at 2.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural user-facing terms — the explicit '"grill" 触发措辞', '压力测试', and 'decision/idea/计划' — giving good coverage of the phrasings a user would actually say when they need this skill.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The dedicated 'grill' trigger word and the stress-testing framing carve out a clear niche that is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.