Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and the single task is clear, but it lacks concrete specifics (document format, exact save location, filename) and has no section organization. Adding light structure and a few concrete details would lift the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Specify the output format and location concretely, e.g. 'Write a Markdown file to the OS temp directory (e.g. $TMPDIR/handoff.md) — not the workspace.'
Add short section headers (e.g. '## What to include', '## What to exclude', '## Handling arguments') so the requirements read as well-organized sections.
Give a minimal handoff-document skeleton (headings for Summary, Open work, Suggested skills) so the guidance is copy-paste ready rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is a lean directive — "保存到用户操作系统的临时目录，不要保存到当前 workspace", "改用 path 或 URL 引用它们" — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete (include a 'suggested skills' section, strip PII, reference artifacts by path/URL) but omits key details such as the document format, exact temp-directory location, and filename, matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-task skill and the single action (write a handoff document) is unambiguous, with clear per-requirement paragraphs; per the simple-skills note this can score 3 without an explicit multi-step sequence. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with no external references needed, but it is a flat run of paragraphs with no section headers, so it does not meet the 'well-organized sections' bar that would warrant a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |