Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of token efficiency: a compact, correctly-ordered workflow that delegates to /tdd and /code-review at the right moments and gates the commit on tests and review. Its only weaknesses are unspecified commands (which typecheck/test commands to run) and the vague '定期' cadence for intermediate checks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is five lean lines with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line adds a directive it could not infer, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable — concrete slash commands (/tdd, /code-review), specific practices (run typechecks, run single test files, run the full suite at the end, commit to the current branch) — but the actual typecheck/test/commit commands are left unspecified, leaving minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered sequence is present (implement via /tdd at agreed seams → periodic typechecks and single-file tests → full suite at the end → /code-review → commit) with checkpoints (final suite, review before commit), but '定期' (periodically) is vague and there is no error-recovery loop, so it stops short of the explicit-validation anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-purpose skill well under 50 lines with no need for external references; per the rubric's simple-skill note, the flat, clearly ordered five-line body qualifies for the top score without sections or bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |