Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable workflow that leverages existing slash-commands and gives a clear sequenced process with periodic validation. Its main weakness is the absence of explicit failure-handling feedback loops and concrete command strings for the typechecking/test steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. Matches the score-5 anchor for lean, efficient content that assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance is present via specific slash-commands ("/tdd", "/code-review") and concrete actions (run typechecking, run a single test file, run the full suite, commit to the branch). Below 5 because there are no copy-paste-ready commands/code for the typechecking and test invocations, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is given (implement via TDD on seams, periodic typechecking/tests, full suite at end, code-review, commit) with validation checkpoints via "定期运行 typechecking" and running tests. Below 5 because explicit feedback loops (if checks fail, fix and retry) are not stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill (~5 lines) with no need for external references, so well-organized concise content earns a 5 per the simple-skill guideline. The content is appropriately self-contained with no nested or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |