Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean orchestration guidance: a coherent, sequenced workflow with explicit checkpoints and no wasted tokens. The only soft spots are the unspecific cadence words ("periodically") and the absence of a failure-handling loop before the final commit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~10-line body is lean with zero padding: every line is an instruction (fetch and restate the ticket, invoke tdd at seams, run typechecks and tests, run code-review, commit). It fully assumes Claude's competence and explains nothing the model already knows, matching "Lean and efficient; every token earns its place". | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: "先从 issue tracker 获取它，并在开始前复述它的标题", "调用 Skill 工具并指定 tdd", "调用 Skill 工具并指定 code-review", "提交到当前 branch". It falls short of 5 due to hedged/vague qualifiers such as "定期" (periodically) and "尽可能" (where possible) that leave timing and conditions unspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (resolve ticket reference → restate title → implement with tdd at seams → periodic typecheck/test runs → full suite → code-review → commit) with most checkpoints explicit, including ambiguity handling ("如果 reference 有歧义，先询问"). It is not 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do when the full suite fails before committing). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; the discrete one-step-per-paragraph organization is well-ordered and trivially navigable, and no bundle files exist to reference. Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, this earns the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |